The whole recap for Day 10 0:00:00 · Ms. McNabb testified that the camera image comes in inverted, so a driver appears to be getting out of the passenger side. 0:04:07 · Ms. McNabb testified that the blue Tesla in Exhibit 331 B pulled into the same spot beside the dumpster on July 30, 2024. 0:02:42 · The witness said the man appeared to be getting trash out of his trunk, after the prosecutor asked what the man appeared to be doing. 0:02:56 · The judge told the defense the point could be raised on cross-examination, in response to the objection. 0:03:11 · The witness said bags were thrown into the trash compactor, after the prosecutor asked what had just been seen at seven minutes in. 0:04:56 · The witness identified exhibit 330b as another view of the trash compactor, dated 07/31/2024, with a time stamp the witness said was slightly off. 0:08:14 · The witness told the jury exhibit 330c showed a night view of the trash compactor and said the area was well lit. 0:08:42 · The witness read the date on exhibit 330c as July 31, 2024, and the time stamp as 12AM, and said it may be an hour or two ahead or behind. 0:12:50 · The witness identified the car entering the screen from the left, about 25 minutes 45 seconds into the video, as one driven by Naresh Bhatt. 0:18:14 · The witness testified that the defendant pulled up near the compactor, opened his trunk wearing white gloves and threw trash bags into the compactor. 0:19:23 · The witness said the defendant threw the trash bags into the compactor, then got more bags and threw more into the compactor while still wearing the gloves. 1:29:42 · Asked whether he, Juan or Miguel used the green Ryobi saw to cut up parts of a human body, Ayala said no. 1:30:12 · The judge asked how long cross-examination was expected to take and then called a break of ten to fifteen minutes. 0:04:20 · Pandey described a call with Bhatt after the disappearance in which Bhatt said he was sad, was praying for Mamta to return and was worried about the baby. 0:09:33 · Pandey testified that Bhatt did not discuss getting divorced with him, after the prosecutor asked whether they had talked about it. 0:00:00 · Judge Irving told the Commonwealth she was not feeling confident it could finish in the timing it gave unless it found a way to move faster. 0:00:36 · Judge Irving said three more weeks was not workable because it would leave the defense no time from the seven weeks set aside. 0:01:02 · Judge Irving told the Commonwealth to use the next four days to look at what might be cumulative or streamlined, so closings and deliberation could fit. 0:01:24 · Judge Irving said she wanted to pick a Friday when court was not sitting for jury instructions, one of the next two Fridays after this one. 0:02:16 · The prosecutor told the judge that some issues had run longer than expected, that it was a three-day work week, and that some days had ended at four. 0:03:06 · The prosecutor told the judge the Commonwealth was reassessing after each session and cutting witnesses it did not need. 0:03:27 · Judge Irving said jurors were told they would be done by Thanksgiving week, which did not mean they would get the case then, and timing had to fit the evidence. 0:04:18 · The prosecutor told the judge the trial timeline was set before the defense had a witness list or experts, so it was based on the Commonwealth's evidence. 0:05:23 · Judge Irving told the court the trial was through ten days, with four days next week and three-day weeks for election day and Veterans Day. 0:06:00 · Lenox told the judge the court had shut the defense down as early as 4:00 and that the defense had lost hours, not days. 0:06:14 · Lenox told the judge the defense had not crossed 70% of the witnesses. 0:06:23 · Judge Irving said the parties should plan the next four days to be as efficient as possible and that she wanted to respect the citizens' time.
Court Minutes